The Natural Selection of Social Utilities

‎לילה פה, בסינגפור הרחוקה אני גולש בפליקר אחרי המון זמן שלא עשיתי את זה לעומק. יש לי מחשב חדש, ואני עסוק בלהכניס אליו את כל המקומות שאני אוהב לגלוש אליהם, כל המקומות הקבועים שלי שבין השאר הם רשתות חברתיות כאלה ואחרות. עם נסיעת הבכורה פה של האקספלורר (יאק יאק) התקנתי את פייסבוק כעמוד הבית שלי ואת הג'ימייל כעמוד בית שני.

‎אני חושב שזה בלבד מסמל את המהפך הגדול שקרה לי, ושאולי קורה כעת לעוד ועוד אנשים שמרכז עולמם הפך להיות בתוך רשת חברתית, כמוני למשל, ואולי פחות נזה, מה שקורה בתיבת המייל הפרטית, או שלא לומר חלילה- מה קורה עכשיו בחדשות למשל.

‎מעבר לזה, פליקר למשל, היה מקום בו הייתי מבלה שעות על שעות, כל יום, בערך כמו שאני מבלה עכשיו בפייסבוק. מן הסתם, עם המעבר שלי מעולם הצילום לעולם האינטרנט במרכז התעסוקה שלי, מרכז הכובד שלי הושקע במקום אחד באופן יחסי. כל זה השתנה ואפשר להבין מזה שרשת חברתית יש לה כוח על בנאדם רק אם הוא נותן לה את המקום הזה בחייו. עכשיו למשל, אני לא מחובר רגשית לפליקר כמו שהייתי מחובר פעם. אמנם הקריירה שלי והזכרונות שלי שם ואני אפילו מעדכן עם הרבה תמונות- אבל אני מעדכן כבר במקום נוסף, ושיש לו חשיבות עצומה לגביי.

‎מעבר לזה חשבתי על עוד משהו- ריבוי הימצאויות ברשתות חברתיות גורם להזנחה של חלק מהן. פשוט אין יכולת או אין סבלנות לעדכן בכולן ולהיות בהן באופן שווה.

‎אומר עוד משהו- אני חושב שהמונח רשת חברתית כבר לא תופס. אני חושב שהמונח יישום חברתי- social utility תופס יותר, כי כל אתר ווב2, אם הוא מוגדר נכון, יש בו איכות חברתית.

‎אחזור לג'ימייל. אני חושב שהמעבר שלי לדף בית חדש מסמל עבורי שמרכז הכובד עבר מנטלית מקיום של "אני במרכז ויבואו אנשים אלי למייל" לקיום של "אני בקבוצה ואני יכול לתקשר בכמה צורות".

‎אגב, מצטער שחיכיתם מלא זמן לפוסט, כאמור, טסתי לחו"ל ואני עדיין מתכנן לכתוב על חוויית המשתמש בכל האתרים שהזכרתי בפוסט הקודם.

‎אני אשמח לשמוע את דעתכם בעניינים שהעליתי פה.

Its night here in Singapore, and after months, I'm enjoying flickr like in the old days where I took my camera everywhere and shot a lot of photos. I have a new laptop, and i'm working on entering new and old favor

ites to my links bar on Avant and Firefox, many of them- social utilities such as Flickr, Facebook, the Cafe, LinkedIn ect…

Moreover, I've decided to put Facebook as my homepage and to "overthrow" Gmail to be my second homepage, for the first time since 2004, when Gmail was introduced to me. I think this move represents a real shift of powers.

Flickr. After months i think, i sat down today and just enjoyed this amazing photo tool called Flickr. But everything changed in my world when i left the photojournalism way of living and got in to the web life. Once, I used to play hours inside Flickr, just like I do now on Facebook, where my real mass is at. All that made me understand that a social utility of any kind has a power over people only if their place in life suits being in that point and place.
Another thing being inside Flickr made me understand is that being in too many places gets some place to get neglected and even more- every social utility is a direct competition to other utilities, even if they're not of the same sort- you know why? because it's not a competition about the cause or the subject- it's a competition about the person's time.

Back to Gmail. I think my shifting from Gmail to Facebook represent a shift of balance from "i'm in the center and let others come to my mail" to an "I'm in a group and can communicate in many ways" state of mind.

I would really love to hear your thoughts about this subject I find very interesting. Originally i wrote it in Hebrew, but then I realized I must share it with as many people I can reach, so please feel free to comment.

Now I go to sleep

 

Mysapce: A user experience Jungle

Every website has its own user interface. The interface, among other things, is what differentiates it from other similar sites on the web. The UI will determine whether users get to their destination as fast as possible (you want that), it will determine the rate of conversion on their part (to converge between an anonymous user to a registered one), it will determine their shopping experience (and the money you make), it will determine if they tell their friends it's a crappy site or a great site. One has to be sensitive as to how users feel when they experience the experience. Make no mistake, the experience is engineered, and that's why, in my opinion, it's impottant to take experts directly from the field, like bloggers to manage and run a blogging product and so on.

In the next few posts I'm going to write about websites you all probably know, Myspace, Flickr, Youtube, different blog spheres and other web utilities. Some posts would be written from the eyes of the user I am, and some would bring my-point-of-view’s "first contact" about the interface and experience based on my knowledge and experience with websites. So, I went to Myspace.

I’ve never opened a user there, and I still don’t have one. From that point, I decided to check only my first impression from the website, to go through the main pages, directed fully by the top bar and not deal with the registered user's experience of the GUI, and by the site’s flow. ***(Of course I am biased, it wasn't my first time on the site but I have to say I haven't been there for more than few seconds each time I've visited there). As the title suggests, Myspace is a jungle, and in the next few paragraphs I'm going to explain why. The most important thing about a social utility and web services in general is the registration and sign in box and process, if you don’t do it right, you lose. Once you're registered you won't go back unless you leave the site for good. You'll meet new friends, you'll upload media of any kind and your inbox will grow. In other words, the minute you sign in is the minute you start having obligations. You’re attached, emotionally.

Myspace's front page does it well. The sign in box is right there in the center of attention. Sadly, some parts from the rest of this big website doesn’t support the registration procedure and it seems someone there didn’t go all the way in terms of understanding how they could help a person register from anywhere. I'll get to that later. So, the main page's first impression is that it's too full. Under the top bar are the Videos, probably there with the help of an editor. Below are music and special feature boxes and on the right- "cool people", more videos and sponsored links. On the bottom there's a big mistake by Myspace- a how-to and where-to-go bar is hiding there and looks like a sponsored links bar. It's a big mistake, because people already know how links are presented by Google. It has become something regular users naturally overlook and this is what Myspace put there. The rationale behind the spread of the sponsored links is not understood.

Main bar.

Browse, Search, Invite. Indeed, it's important, but all these options take you looking for people. Why not create a unified page, a center, where you look for your friends, search for love and invite others to Myspace? From a UI perspective, it's not that complicated.

Video. In my opinion, when you go to a video page you need to give people the “play” symbol in one or two clicks maximum. When you're in the main video page, every click there will bring you to the author's page where you will have to look for an embedded video or the pics-and-videos links that are actually hiding (unbelievably) at the almost top of the page. Also, take into consideration the fact that every user can change, even a bit, the page’s layout and that the comments box has unlimited space to grow (A scrolling down Hell) and you could say for sure: Welcome to the Jungle. One of the main platforms Myspace uses is the Myspacetv.com. If you end up there any way, why not create the Myspacetv zone as a main space inside Myspace and or replace the Myspace platform to be Myspacetv? Why not let users who use it on an everyday basis, create their space AROUND the TV zone and not start linking to it. Let it be their home.It could save people's time, effort, headache- AND CLICKS. I wanted to address one more thing about clicks in this website: In order to fully get access to everywhere- you need to sign in. When there's a link that takes you to a "registered only" zone you will bounce back to the start page in order to sign in and you may feel the link is broken (a lousy feeling you as website owner can eliminate in 2 minutes). A better idea would be to create a pop up window that would sign you in without going back to the start. Another idea is to direct guests to a specially designed page only for guests to register or sign in and than automatically bring them to their destination. Simple and doable.

Blogs. This page is horrible. Not only it's vertical in nature (everything vertical is a disaster). I tried to enter the first blogs a few times and they're private and blocked by the users themselves. So I'm asking myself, why promote private blogs as the top cohice blogs? Why not create a private vs. public blogs sections? Have no mistake, everything can be made, everything is hand made there. You would think a website would encourage people to stay public and than give them the-top-of-the-list place, but no, you get a no entry page when you click (no-no-no), and it wouldn't help you to be registered, you have to be friends with the writer first. Also, have you heard of the Long Tail effect? It's there, big time, and go search for your friends on page 37 or somewhere and good luck with that Forums. When the main page looks like that you know that you're going to have to come back to it many times in order to jump between conversations inside your forum or between your favorite forums. Pages over pages with nothing to do that act as a corridor to get you to where you acrually wanted to go. Why?!

Groups. Go to the automotive groups’ page for example. A thing that didn't occur to the Myspace people in the groups’ context is that a first page has to be organized alphabetically by default and not in any other way so to save clicks and help people find what they're looking for as fast as possible. Oh, and by the way- A GOOD SEACH BOX could help.

Events. Guys, choose where you put your Google ads, c’mon. And how do you think events should be organized, by date, right? Myspace people don’t think so.

Music. I don't know… some pages didn’t open or took'm ages… I got tired.

Comedy. Bottom line, all roads lead to myspacetv.com. As I suggested before, I think Myspace should reorganize itself around their TV platform and not the other way around.

Conclusion- Sometimes I feel it’s all about the interface. Most of times it’s true- A website could rise and fall because of UX engineering. Myspace is different. It succeeded despite its mess. At present, it’s the biggest and most successful social utility on the web even despite not being UX friendly. It means the need for what Myspace is giving is stronger than the people’s will to get a good engineered product. There’s a saying: Don’t fix something that is not broken. This is not the case.

 

 

Google’s Analyst Day Video

‏ This video has more than an hour of length, and it's from the Google’s Analyst Day from October 24th, if I'm not mistaking.
I actually learned quite a lot from it, and when I say I learned, I mean that few thoughts, new thoughts came to my mind and as what I do is to tailor different thoughts and ideas into new domains (apps, theories, anthropology ect…), this video gave me a possibility to look at the projects i'm at right now and to throw myself to a different dimension of thinking about them, and that is what was so important for me about it.

Never mind the dimensions I was telling you about, look at the product manager's self expression, look at their body language, their clothes. You can actually learn so much about them and of Google atmosphere they work in. And to Google's credit I gotta say their product managers seem self confiedent, it's refreshing to see, I loved it. Esspecially, the geek from Brown University who wear all brown clothes. He's an example of what space and atmosphere you want to give your emplyees. They're geeks? Let them celebrate it, let them connect their inner winner… and another credit (they pointed out more than 3 times in this video) is that they're taking people right out of university, with no experience, because experience, although important stops you more than you realize. As you know, the past stops you. You may learn from it and even know what you learned, but what you dont know is where you are stopped by it, and this is something Google is doing smartly.
I wish the Israeli internet industry could learn from them.
@http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQGNiUxZjyQ

originally from mashable